Hello, premier!
I'm having problems with finding the integrals of inverse trig functions.
For example, I'm not sure why or what to substitute for U. In this example
Integral of 1 / x*sqrt [x^2 - 25]
The book substituted x = 5u and dx = 5 du.
Another example
Integral of 1 / sqrt [1 - 4x^2]
u = 2x and dx = 1/2 du
I don't understand the logic behind the substitution, x = 5u and u = 2x.
How do you choose what to substitute?
Why is it being substituted as 5u and 2x instead of something else?
It looks like you have a textbook that uses "1" in everything . . . (How I hate those!)
In the first problem, the denominator has:
. x (x<sup>2</sup> - 25)<sup>1/2</sup>
It would fit your arcsec formula, except the formula has:
. u (u<sup>2</sup> - 1)<sup>1/2</sup>
To make our problem fit the formula, let:
.x = 5u ... dx = 5 du
. . Then:
. x<sup>2</sup> - 25
. =
. (5u)<sup>2</sup> - 25
. =
. 25u<sup>2</sup> - 25
. =
. 25(u<sup>2</sup> - 1)
. . With the square root, we have:
. 5(u<sup>2</sup> - 1)<sup>1/2</sup>
The entire denominator is:
. x(x<sup>2</sup> - 25)<sup>1/2</sup>
. =
. 5u·5(u<sup>2</sup> - 1)<sup>1/2</sup>
. =
. 25u(u<sup>2</sup> - 1)<sup>1/2</sup>
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 du
. . . . . . . . 1
. . . . . . . . .du
The integral is:
. [int] -----------------
. =
. --- [int] ----------------
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25u(u<sup>2</sup> -1)<sup>1/2</sup>
. . . . 5
. . . . . u(u<sup>2</sup> - 1)<sup>1/2</sup>
NOW it fits the arcsecant formula . . . you can do the integration.
. . . (Don't forget to back-substitute.)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
[rant]
I would give you a much simpler formula for these problems . . .
. . but every time I do, SOMEONE counters with
. . "I'd rather have my students
understand the reasoning
. . instead of just
memorizing formulas!"
as if LEARNING a few formulas is a terrible thing.
If "Learning = Memorizing = Evil", then why have formulas at all?
If you want the derivative of f(x) = x<sup>4</sup>, use the differerence quotient.
If you want the distance between two points, make a right triangle and use Pythagorus.
If you want the equation of a parabola, derive it from its focus and directrix.
If you want 3 x 7, find 7 + 7 + 7.
. . (God forbid we should
memorize anything!)
Okay, one more time . . . I do
NOT advocate blind memorization, got it?
I taught math for thirty-eight years (successfully, I'd say) with clear explanations and derivations.
When I derived a formula for my students, I'd give them the
best formula available, not one that
requires additional (and tedious) adjustments.
.If such adjustments are necessary, I would
<u>incorporate</u> them into the formula . . . and we'd use the generalized formula.
So why all the flak?
. Since you must MEMORIZE the arcsecant formula anyway,
why not learn one which eliminates all the work I did above?
. (All of it!)
I'll let my opponents explain the second problem . . . they deserve it.
[/rant]