Interesting. Don't see yet where this is leading. My solution took advantage of the segment in the diagram and the relationships between areas of triangles with the same height. Is the theorem you mentioned relevant to those?I solved it using a different auxiliary segment:
I suspect the segment in their diagram may require using a theorem I haven't memorized, for which my segment may be part of the proof.
I'm probably just missing something obvious in your method (which I often do in this sort of problem). My method uses proportionality of area to base and height, as well as similar triangles. It's probably far too complicated.Interesting. Don't see yet where this is leading. My solution took advantage of the segment in the diagram and the relationships between areas of triangles with the same height. Is the theorem you mentioned relevant to those?
Same here.My method uses proportionality of area to base and height, as well as similar triangles.