Ian McPherson
New member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2011
- Messages
- 24
I know that one formula for indefinite integrals states that du/u gives you ln|u| + c. so in the problem integral (3x)/(2+x2), u is 2+x2 and du is 2x. So you put a 3/2 on the outside to balance for the 2/3 that you multipy the numerator by to make it the required 2x. i now have (3/2) integral (2x)/(2+x2). Now, since i fit the formula du/u, the answer is (3/2) ln |2+x2| + c.
But the problem proceeding that, integral (x2)/((x3-1)1/2) is u = x3 -1 and du is 3x2. so you have (1/3) integral (3x2)/(x3-1)1/2. Which is du/u. But when my professor worked it, the answer comes out as 2/3(x3-1)1/2 + c. My question is not how to work these problems, it's why does the first problem fit du/u and the answer is a natural logarithm, while the second also becomes du/u yet there is no natural logarithm in the answer?
But the problem proceeding that, integral (x2)/((x3-1)1/2) is u = x3 -1 and du is 3x2. so you have (1/3) integral (3x2)/(x3-1)1/2. Which is du/u. But when my professor worked it, the answer comes out as 2/3(x3-1)1/2 + c. My question is not how to work these problems, it's why does the first problem fit du/u and the answer is a natural logarithm, while the second also becomes du/u yet there is no natural logarithm in the answer?