Idealistic
Junior Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2007
- Messages
- 97
Let a, b, c, and d be complex numbers. Show that the two lines Re(az + b) and Re(cz + d) are perpendicular if and only if Re(ac*) = 0.
I'm pretty sure I should relate this back to the dot prduct formula with:
cos(theta) = Re(ac*)/mag(a)mag(c)
theta = 0 if Re(ac*) = 0
but to prove it do I use the Law of cosines? if so, do I break the lines up into a = a1 + ia2 and c = c1 + ic2 or just treat them as vectors as a starting point for the proof?
Re(az + b) = Re(a1 + ia2(x + iy) + b) = a1x - a2y + b
Re(cz + d) = Re(c1 + ic2)(s + it) + d) = c1s - c2t + d
EDIT. Sorry, its just supposed to be:
Let a, b, c, and d be complex numbers. Show that the two lines Re(az + b) and Re(cz + d) are perpendicular if and only if Re(ac*) = 0.
c* is just the conjugate of c.
I'm pretty sure I should relate this back to the dot prduct formula with:
cos(theta) = Re(ac*)/mag(a)mag(c)
theta = 0 if Re(ac*) = 0
but to prove it do I use the Law of cosines? if so, do I break the lines up into a = a1 + ia2 and c = c1 + ic2 or just treat them as vectors as a starting point for the proof?
Re(az + b) = Re(a1 + ia2(x + iy) + b) = a1x - a2y + b
Re(cz + d) = Re(c1 + ic2)(s + it) + d) = c1s - c2t + d
EDIT. Sorry, its just supposed to be:
Let a, b, c, and d be complex numbers. Show that the two lines Re(az + b) and Re(cz + d) are perpendicular if and only if Re(ac*) = 0.
c* is just the conjugate of c.