One huge problem with this is the matter of variation on definitions.Suppose that S and T are sets and that [MATH] T\subseteq S[/MATH].
(a) If S is a countable set, then T is a countable set.
(b) If T is an uncountable set, then S is an uncountable set.
Do you see that (b) is the contrapositive of (a)? Then if you accept their proof of (a), there is nothing more to say.i can't prove b.. in theorem 1.3.9.