How to prove a binomial identity?

You want to choose r objects from k+1 objects.
Suppose you number the k+1 objects 1, 2, 3,...,k+1
Lets concentrate on the 1st object. Either we choose the first object or we don't choose it.
Suppose we do choose the 1st object: So we need to choose an additional r-1 objects from k objects (we can't pick the 1st object again!)
Suppose we do not choose the 1st object: So we need to choose r objects from k objects (the objects we are picking from is 2,3,4,...k+1).
Therefore (k+1)Cr = kC(r-1) + kCr

Alternative you can just use the definition for kC(r-1) and kCr, get a .common denominator and note that it equals (k+1)Cr
 
You need to let us know what you've been able to do so far.

Since I don't know where you are with this I'll start you off:
[math]\left ( \begin{matrix} k \\ r - 1 \end{matrix} \right ) + \left ( \begin{matrix} k \\ r \end{matrix} \right ) = \left ( \begin{matrix} k + 1 \\ r \end{matrix} \right ) [/math]
You need to show:
[math] \dfrac{k!}{(r - 1)!(k - (r - 1))!} + \dfrac{k!}{r!(k - r)!} = \dfrac{(k + 1)!}{r!((k + 1) - r)!}[/math]
Give this a try and let us know what you can do with this.

-Dan
 
You want to choose r objects from k+1 objects.
Suppose you number the k+1 objects 1, 2, 3,...,k+1
Lets concentrate on the 1st object. Either we choose the first object or we don't choose it.
Suppose we do choose the 1st object: So we need to choose an additional r-1 objects from k objects (we can't pick the 1st object again!)
Suppose we do not choose the 1st object: So we need to choose r objects from k objects (the objects we are picking from is 2,3,4,...k+1).
Therefore (k+1)Cr = kC(r-1) + kCr

Alternative you can just use the definition for kC(r-1) and kCr, get a .common denominator and note that it equals (k+1)Cr
When you say “let’s concentrate on the first object,” what are you referring to?
 
When you say “let’s concentrate on the first object,” what are you referring to?
To be more clear, lets call the k+1 objects the 1st object, the 2nd object, the 3rd object,..., the (k+1)st object.
Now either we choose the 1st object or we do not choose the 1st object. I am just breaking up (k+1)Cr combinations into to two disjoint sets--those that include the 1st object and those that do not include the 1st object. Is this clear?
 
To be more clear, lets call the k+1 objects the 1st object, the 2nd object, the 3rd object,..., the (k+1)st object.
Now either we choose the 1st object or we do not choose the 1st object. I am just breaking up (k+1)Cr combinations into to two disjoint sets--those that include the 1st object and those that do not include the 1st object. Is this clear?
I’m confused as to why your reasoning implies the conclusion. This is due to my lack of understanding of what it means to select objects. I can’t translate your reasoning into mathematical notation.
 

To be more clear, lets call the k+1 objects the 1st object, the 2nd object, the 3rd object,..., the (k+1)st object.
Now either we choose the 1st object or we do not choose the 1st object. I am just breaking up (k+1)Cr combinations into to two disjoint sets--those that include the 1st object and those that do not include the 1st object. Is this clear?
also, I am lost as to how the denominator can be rearranged to yield (k+1)Cr. If you can walk me through that, I’d be very grateful!
 



also, I am lost as to how the denominator can be rearranged to yield (k+1)Cr. If you can walk me through that, I’d be very grateful!
actually, I figured out how to rearrange the denominator to prove the identity, but I am still very interested in understanding your reasoning!! Thank you!
 
In how many ways can you choose r objects from k+1 objects if you must choose the 1st object?

In how many ways can you choose r objects from k+1 objects if you will not choose the 1st object?

Please answer these questions. If you have any questions/problems then please ask.
 
In how many ways can you choose r objects from k+1 objects if you must choose the 1st object?

In how many ways can you choose r objects from k+1 objects if you will not choose the 1st object?

Please answer these questions. If you have any questions/problems then please ask.
Jomo,

Can you please rephrase that question?

I do not see a way to choose any more object/s, if I do not choose the 1st object?
 
Here is better wording.
If in the end you want to choose r objects from k+1 objects, then in how many ways can you do this if you must choose the 1st object?
If in the end you want to choose r objects from k+1 objects, then in how many ways can you do this if you will not choose the 1st object?
 
Here is better wording.
If in the end you want to choose r objects from k+1 objects, then in how many ways can you do this if you must choose the 1st object?
If in the end you want to choose r objects from k+1 objects, then in how many ways can you do this if you will not choose the 1st object?
I know the answers are r - 1 and r, respectively, but I fail entirely to understand why that’s the case. Is it because 0 <= r < k+1 ? if so, why?
 
I know the answers are r - 1 and r, respectively, but I fail entirely to understand why that’s the case. Is it because 0 <= r < k+1 ? if so, why?
Not sure how you know the answer but don't know why
The answers are to be in the form of aCb (the number of ways to choose b objects from a objects)
 
You goal is to compute how many ways you can pick r objects from from k+1 objects.
Imagine the k+1 objects in a line and numbered 1 through k+1
Now some of these combinations will include object number 1 and some will not include objects number 1. I hope that you see that the number way to include object number 1 plus the number of way to exclude object number 1 will equal rC(k+1)

Suppose you are going to choose number 1. So there is no decision to be made with object number 1 as you ARE choosing number 1. So what decisions do you have to make? Since your goal is to pick r objects and you already picked 1, then you must pick r-1 more objects. Now where are you going to choose the r-1 objects from? The answer is from object number 2, from object number 3, ..., object number k+1, which is k objects. So you need to choose r-1 objects from k or (n-1)Ck

Now suppose you are NOT going to choose object number 1. So there is no decision to be made with object number 1 as you are NOT choosing number 1. So what decisions do you have to make? Since your goal is to pick r objects and you so far picked none, then you must pick r objects. Now where are you going to choose the r objects from? The answer is from object number 2, from object number 3, ..., object number k+1, which is k objects. So you need to choose r objects from k or rCk

As a result of all this we get rC(k+1) = (n-1)Ck + rCk
 
It seems to me that we have ignored Dan's very cogent advice.

There are two very distinct issue: (1) why does a binomial coefficient give the number of distinct ways to select r objects from k distinct objects without regard to order, and (2) how to show algebraically that a certain relationship exists among three different binomial coefficients.

The first issue needs to be demonstrated by a proof by induction. Moreover, it requires a fair amount of explanation about the meaning of what is being demonstrated.

The second issue simply takes a bit of algebra plus a clear understanding of factorial notation.

[MATH]\text {PROVE: } 1 \le r \le n \text { and } k,\ r \in \mathbb Z \implies \dbinom{k}{r - 1} + \dbinom{k}{r} = \dbinom{k + 1}{r}.[/MATH]
As topsquark implied, binomial coefficients are well defined fractions, and we know that to add fractions we need equal common denominators.

[MATH]\dbinom{k}{r - 1} + \dbinom{k}{r} = \dfrac{k!}{(r - 1)! * \{k - (r - 1)\}}+ \dfrac{k!}{r! * (k - r)!} =[/MATH]
[MATH]\dfrac{k!}{(r - 1)! * (k + 1 - r)!} + \dfrac{k!}{r! * (k - r)!} =[/MATH]
[MATH]\dfrac{r * k!}{r * (r - 1)! * (k + 1 - r)!} + \dfrac{(k + 1 - r) * k!}{r! * (k + 1 - r) * (k - r)!} = [/MATH]
[MATH]\dfrac{r * k!}{r! * (k + 1 - r)!} + \dfrac{(k + 1 - r) * k!}{r! * (k + 1 - r)!}.[/MATH]
Now do the addition and simplify. What do you get? Does that look like a binomial coefficient?
 
Top