How do you solve the posted problem using Rouche's theorem--Complex Analysis

Steven G

Elite Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
14,566
Let f(z) and g(z) be analytic functions on the bounded domain D that extend continuously to dD and satisfies |f(z) +g(z)| < If(z)|+ Ig(z)| on dD. Show that f(z) and g(z) have the same number of zeros in D, counting multiplicity

I can prove that f(z) and g(z) have no zeros.
At that point I am lost.
Any hints/solutions would be helpful.
 
Let f(z) and g(z) be analytic functions on the bounded domain D that extend continuously to dD and satisfies |f(z) +g(z)| < If(z)|+ Ig(z)| on dD. Show that f(z) and g(z) have the same number of zeros in D, counting multiplicity

I can prove that f(z) and g(z) have no zeros.
At that point I am lost.
Any hints/solutions would be helpful.
I'm unsure whether this can help, but this is a summary of complex functions:
It has residue formulas, some tricks, and examples. The residue theorem appears to be called for, maybe applied to [imath] f\pm g. [/imath] But I miss the point where the strict triangle inequality kicks in. Don't we have [imath] |z_1+z_2| \leq |z_1|+|z_2| [/imath] for any complex numbers? So how does strictness change the situation? This is all we have. At least it rules out [imath] f=c\cdot g. [/imath]
 
I have found a theorem (Rouché's theorem) that uses the strict inequality and which might be of help here:

Suppose [imath] f [/imath] and [imath] g [/imath] are meromorphic in a neighborhood of [imath] \overline{B}(a;R) [/imath] with no zeros ( [imath]Z [/imath]) or poles ( [imath]P [/imath]) on the circle [imath]\gamma =\{z\in \mathbb{C}\,|\,|z-a|=R\} [/imath]. If [imath]Z_f,Z_g,P_f,P_g [/imath] are the numbers of zeros, resp. poles, of [imath] f [/imath] and [imath] g [/imath] inside [imath]\gamma [/imath] counted according to their multiplicities and if
[math] |f(z)+g(z)|<|f(z)|+|g(z)| [/math]on [imath] \gamma , [/imath] then
[math] Z_f-P_f=Z_g-P_g\;. [/math]Proof: From the hypothesis
[math] \left|\dfrac{f(z)}{g(z)+1}\right|< \left|\dfrac{f(z)}{g(z)}\right|+1 [/math]on [imath]\gamma . [/imath] If [imath]\lambda :=f(z)/g(z) [/imath] and if [imath]\lambda [/imath] is a positive real number then this inequality becomes [imath] \lambda +1<\lambda +1, [/imath] a contradiction. Hence the meromorphic function [imath]f/g [/imath] maps [imath]\gamma [/imath] onto [imath]\Omega:=\mathbb{C}-[0,\infty ). [/imath] If [imath] L [/imath] is a branch of the logarithm on [imath]\Omega [/imath] then [imath]L(f(z)(g(z)) [/imath] is a well-defined primitive for [imath](f/g)\,'(f/g)^{-1} [/imath] in a neighborhood of [imath]\gamma . [/imath] Thus
[math]\begin{array}{lll} 0&= \dfrac{1}{2\pi i} \int_\gamma (f/g)\,'(f/g)^{-1} \\[12pt] &= \dfrac{1}{2\pi i} \int_\gamma \left(\dfrac{f\,'}{f}-\dfrac{g\,'}{g}\right)\\[12pt] &= (Z_f-P_f)-(Z_g-P_g). \end{array}[/math]
 
Top