How am I supposed to understand |x-2|>=1 in its place in this problem?
Hi Integrate. You already understand the format for a piecewise function, yes? (The expression after each comma provides the function's domain for that piece.) Therefore, |x–2|≥1 must describe a set of x-values.
Thinking graphically, when we subtract one number from another, their difference can be viewed as the distance between those two points on the Real number line. The absolute value symbols around x–2 indicate that we don't care whether the difference between 2 and x is positive or negative. In other words, the expression |x–2| describes the distance between the numbers 2 and x, regardless of whether x lies to the left of 2 or to the right.
To specify that the distance |x–2| is greater than or equal to 1 defines a set of x-values. It's the set containing all numbers x that are one unit or more away from the number 2, on either side. What number is 1 unit away from 2, to the left? That's the number 1. And, all numbers to the left of 1 are more than one unit away from 2. Likewise, the number 3 is one unit away from 2, to the right, and all numbers to the right of 3 are also more than one unit away from 2.
That all's exactly what skeeter said succinctly, in math-speak.
Are you familiar with properties of absolute value? Some show us how to remove absolute value symbols (i.e., how to interpret algebraically). Here's the relevant property:
Given the form
|x| > c
We may write
x > c
OR
x < -c
(The property holds if we replace symbols > and < with ≥ and ≤.)
Hence, given the statement |x – 2| ≥ 1, we may write:
x – 2 ≥ 1
OR
x – 2 ≤ -1
Solving those two inequalities for x is another way to interpret the domain for the parabolic piece of your f(x).
[imath]\;[/imath]