How did I get a negative volume with Washer Method?

Shutterbug424

New member
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Messages
40
numerouno.jpg


I got the volume using the shell method as being \(\displaystyle {\frac{{3\pi}}{{ 2}}}\)

When I used the washer method, I took 2 integrals.

This was the first one:
\(\displaystyle V = \pi \int\limits_{ - 1}^0 {\left( {\sqrt {\frac{{x - 3}}{{ - 4}}} } \right)} ^2 - \left( { \sqrt { - x}} \right)^2 dx\)

\(\displaystyle = \pi \int\limits_{ - 1}^0 {\frac{x}{{ - 4}}} + \frac{3}{4} + x dx\)

When I evaluate it, I get a negative answer which couldn't possibly be right. I noticed when I switch some of the positive and negative signs, I get the answer I need to get,
which is \(\displaystyle \frac{{3\pi }}{8}\)

The second equation I evaluated was:
\(\displaystyle V = \pi \int\limits_0^3 {\left( {\sqrt {\frac{{x - 3}}{{ - 4}}} } \right)} ^2 dx\)

I found this to be \(\displaystyle \frac{{9\pi }}{8}\)

When I add \(\displaystyle \frac{{3\pi }}{8}\) and \(\displaystyle \frac{{9\pi }}{8}\), I get \(\displaystyle \frac{{3\pi }}{2}\) (which I believe to be the correct answer).

My question is, where did I go wrong in the first equation that it didn't exactly work out to be \(\displaystyle \frac{{3\pi }}{8}\)?
 
Shutterbug424 said:
... My question is, where did I go wrong in the first equation that it didn't exactly work out to be \(\displaystyle \frac{{3\pi }}{8}\)?


Hi Shutterbug:

It looks to me like you might have evaluated the integral incorrectly; I'm not sure because I'm not able to see how you arrived at -3?/8.

Both of your first two equations work out to V = 3?/8, for me.

Cheers,

~ Howard I. Noe :)

 
Thanks for your help :)

I evaluated yours, and I still got a negative 3pi/8

I must be doing something wrong. When I have a radical squared, does that just leave behind what was under the radical? Or does it somehow change signs?
 
Shutterbug424 said:
... I must be doing something wrong ...


I think so. If you show your work, then you give us a chance to find any error(s).

... When I have a radical squared, does that just leave behind what was under the radical? YES

Or does it somehow change signs? NO
 
So, with your method

\(\displaystyle v = \frac{\pi }{4}\int\limits_{ - 1}^0 {\left( {\sqrt {3 - x} } \right)} ^2 dx - \pi \int\limits_{ - 1}^0 {\left( {\sqrt -x } \right)} ^2 dx\)

\(\displaystyle = \frac{\pi }{4}\int\limits_{ - 1}^0 {\left( {3 - x} \right)} dx - \pi \int\limits_{ - 1}^0 {\left( { - x} \right)} dx\)

\(\displaystyle = \frac{\pi }{4}\left[ {3x - \frac{{x^2 }}{2}} \right]_{ - 1}^0 - \pi \left[ {\frac{{ - x^2 }}{2}} \right]_{ - 1}^0\)

\(\displaystyle = \frac{\pi }{4}\left( { - 3 - \frac{1}{2}} \right) + \frac{\pi }{2}\)

\(\displaystyle = \frac{{ - 7\pi }}{8} + \frac{{4\pi }}{8} = \frac{{ - 3\pi }}{8}\)
 
Shutterbug424 said:
...

\(\displaystyle = \frac{\pi }{4}\left[ {3x - \frac{{x^2 }}{2}} \right]_{ - 1}^0 - \pi \left[ {\frac{{ - x^2 }}{2}} \right]_{ - 1}^0\)

\(\displaystyle = \frac{\pi }{4}\left( { - 3 - \frac{1}{2}} \right) + \frac{\pi }{2}\)


It looks to me that you've evaluated these integrals by simply plugging in -1 into an antiderivative. That's not how we evaluate integrals.

We need to use BOTH of the endpoints of the interval when evaluating a definite integral.

EG:

\(\displaystyle \left. \frac{1}{x} \right|_{ a }^b \;=\; \frac{1}{b} \;-\; \frac{1}{a}\)

Does the following make sense?

\(\displaystyle = \frac{\pi }{4} \cdot \left( {0 - (-3) - (-\frac{1}{2})} \right) + \pi \cdot \left( 0 - \frac{1}{2} \right)\)

Your original method is also valid; perhaps, you made the same mistake evaluating that one.

~ Howard I. Noe :)

 
Yes. Thank you!

I guess I was just so used to rejecting zero because it is usually the lesser value. Thanks for curing my tunnel-vision :)
 
Shutterbug424 said:
...Thanks for curing my tunnel-vision


I would like you to realize how much easier (for everyone involved) and more quickly this error could have been resolved had you simply posted your work at the very beginning.

 
Top