lasvegas666
New member
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2024
- Messages
- 32
Integrate both sides as before.
So velocity is a derivative of speed?Integrate both sides as before.
Velocity [imath]v(t)[/imath] is the derivative of position [imath]s(t)[/imath].So velocity is a derivative of speed?
I got it now.
You said velocity is the derivative of displacement[imath]\displaystyle \frac{d}{dt}(s - s_0)[/imath], yet, you wrote position [imath]\displaystyle \frac{d}{dt}(s)[/imath].Velocity is not the derivative of "speed" or "position"; it is the derivative of displacement wrt time: \(\displaystyle \frac{\mathrm{ds}}{\mathrm{dt}}\)
Displacement (s) is a vector quantity (with magnitude & direction), it is not (s - s0).You said velocity is the derivative of displacement[imath]\displaystyle \frac{d}{dt}(s - s_0)[/imath], yet, you wrote position [imath]\displaystyle \frac{d}{dt}(s)[/imath].
You meant to say [imath]\bold{v} = \displaystyle \frac{d}{dt}\bold{s} = \displaystyle \frac{d}{dt}(\bold{p} - \bold{p_0})[/imath]Displacement (s) is a vector quantity (with magnitude & direction), it is not (s - s0).
It's magnitude might be determined by (p - p0), where p & p0 are two positions (current & initial respectively) and so it should be written as:-
\(\displaystyle \frac{\mathrm{ds}}{\mathrm{dt}}\) or \(\displaystyle \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{dt}}\mathrm{s}\)
No, it is the derivative of displacement.You meant to say [imath]\bold{v} = \displaystyle \frac{d}{dt}\bold{s} = \displaystyle \frac{d}{dt}(\bold{p} - \bold{p_0})[/imath]
But
[imath]\bold{v} = \displaystyle \frac{d}{dt}(\bold{p} - 0) = \displaystyle \frac{d}{dt}(\bold{p})[/imath]
Which is still the derivative of position.
I have just shown you that it is not wrong to say velocity is the derivative of position in this problem of #1. It is up to you how far you wanna go with your argument.No, it is the derivative of displacement.
Please don't engage in any further semantic argument; this is an already well defined concept.