rachelmaddie
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2019
- Messages
- 851
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes except you missed grouping symbols in the first line (without those your "work" would be incorrect.Is my work correct?
To find the value of x
NM/KM = LN/JK
x/3+x= 5/10
Cross multiply
10x = 5(3+x)
10x = 5(3) + 5(x)
10x = 15 + 5x
10x - 5x = 5x
15 = 5x
x = 3
Substitute the value of x to find the measures
KM = 3 +(3) = 6
NM = x = 3View attachment 14344
What are you referring to?Yes except you missed grouping symbols in the first line (without those your "work" would be incorrect.
By writing the steps?Missing parentheses again. And you need to justify.
By writing justification for each step. E.g. why NM/KM = LN/JK ?By writing the steps?
NM/KM is proportional to LN/JK?By writing justification for each step. E.g. why NM/KM = LN/JK ?
Hopefully I’ve done a better job of justifying.Missing parentheses again. And you need to justify.
When the three pairs of angles are all equal, the triangles are similar (two given and one consequential implies similarity.)Very good.
I'd also add in a justification for your reasoning that the two triangles are similar, ie three angle pairs (two given and one consequential) are equal implies similarity.
Your sentence "When triangles are similar, the three angle pairs are all equal" is not the same as "when the three pairs of angles are all equal, the triangles are similar". Can you see the subtle difference there? It's sort of like the chicken and the egg. Firstly, you know (given) that the three pairs of angles are equal, thus implying similarity. Once you have given a reason for similarity (AAA) you can then say the bit about proportionality of sides.
The similar triangles are KMJ and NML.Your answer in post #8 is correct.
First, no matter which method used, you should reduce 5/10 to 1/2.Is my work correct?
To find the value of x
NM/KM = LN/JK
x/(3+x)= 5/10...................................................edited