If you take a whole number containing 4 digits (eg 4321) and take away a second number containing the same 4 digits but in a different order (eg 1234) why does the answer always end up being a multiple of 9 regardless of the 4 digits used?
Let's do it for a two digit number. The same principle holds for a four digit number, although a little more complicated.
94 - 49 = 45 which is a multiple of 9.
9(10)+4 - 4(10)+9 is same problem written in standard form.
Let a two digit number be represented by ab.
ab - ba = ?
Standard form gives us...
(10a+b) - (10b+a) =
10a+b - 10b - a =
10a - 10b -a + b =
10(a - b) -(a-b) =
9(a-b) which is a multiple of 9.
If you take a whole number containing 4 digits (eg 4321) and take away a second number containing the same 4 digits
but in a different order (eg 1234), why does the answer always end up being a multiple of 9 regardless of the 4 digits used?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.