I would factor [imath]6x^2+5x+1 =(3x+1)(2x+1)=0[/imath], so [imath]x=-1/2[/imath] or [imath]x=-1/3[/imath].Suppose you are given the equation 6x^2+5x+1 = 0. How would you solve this?
Did you notice that you got the reciprocal of -2 and -3? Do you know why?I would factor [imath]6x^2+5x+1 =(3x+1)(2x+1)=0[/imath], so [imath]x=-1/2[/imath] or [imath]x=-1/3[/imath].
Well, I got the answer from solve the 2 equationsDid you notice that you got the reciprocal of -2 and -3? Do you know why?
Can you think of a quadratic that has x=-3 and x=-2 as its roots?Well, I got the answer from solve the 2 equations
I think this would happen when the "c" in the quadratic is 1, and the quadratic is factorable.
- (3x+1)=0 =>3x=-1 =>x=-1/3
- (2x+1)=0 =>2x=-1 =>x=-1/2
I can work backwards. A simple one would be [imath](x+3)(x+2)=x^2+5x+6=0[/imath]Can you think of a quadratic that has x=-3 and x=-2 as its roots?
Does the quadratic you just got and the one which I started this post with look similar in any way?I can work backwards. A simple one would be [imath](x+3)(x+2)=x^2+5x+6=0[/imath]
Yes, very interesting. It's a different combination of the coefficients 1, 5, and 6, more specifically "a" and "c" are swapped while "b" remained the same. Is that the point you're trying to get at?Does the quadratic you just got and the one which I started this post with look similar in any way?
You got it. Now try to prove it! Of course \(\displaystyle c \neq 0\)Yes, very interesting. It's a different combination of the coefficients 1, 5, and 6, more specifically "a" and "c" are swapped while "b" remained the same. Is that the point you're trying to get at?
Suppose we have a quadratic [imath]ax^2+bx+c=0[/imath], and its solutions are [imath]x_1[/imath] and [imath]x_2[/imath],
then the roots of [imath]cx^2+bx+a=0[/imath] are [imath]\frac{1}{x_1}[/imath] and [imath]\frac{1}{x_2}[/imath]
Can you make a substitution? replace x with ...You got it. Now try to prove it! Of course \(\displaystyle c \neq 0\)
I don't know. It is your proof that you need to figure out. Please try whatever you think might work.Can you make a substitution? replace x with ...