I was asked to find the range of -1 / (x^2 + 3x +2), entirely algebraically.
I began with finding the domain which turns out to be x cannot =-1 or -2 (after factorising the quadratic).
However, as I began to attempt to find the range, I was stuck. Creating a graph of the function makes it fairly easy to find the range, but I need to know is how do you find the range algebraically.
Thanks
There are at least two ways.
One is to ask yourself a few questions about f(x).
Are there values of x where f(x) is positive? Can you demonstrate the answer algebraically?
Is there a maximum positive value for f(x)? Can you demonstrate the answer algebraically?
Is there a minimum positive value for f(x)? Can you demonstrate the answer algebraically?
Are there values of x where f(x) is negative? Can you demonstrate the answer algebraically?
Is there a maximum negative value for f(x)? Can you demonstrate the answer algebraically?
Is there a minimum negative value for f(x)? Can you demonstrate the answer algebraically?
Does f(x) have any zeroes? Can you demonstrate algebraically?
Those are very obvious questions, but, for differentiable functions, it helps to know differential calculus to answer them. So another way to go is to find the domain of the inverse function (or the domains of the inverse functions if there is not a single inverse).
EDIT: I see that Dr. Peterson has beat me to the punch. I agree with him that for this function working with inverses is probably the easier way to go, and it definitely is the easier if you know no differential calculus. I am not sure, however, that working with inverse functions is always the easier way to go (nor am I implying thatDr. Peterson made any such assertion). Moreover, when working with inverses, remember that a function may have different inverses in different intervals of the domain.
SECOND EDIT: I also see that Dr. Peterson and I are using different vocabularies about inverses. He is talking about an inverse relation whereas I am talking about inverse functions in intervals. I do not believe that we are disagreeing about something fundamental, merely expressing the same fact in different words.