Fact Fluency Question

Kiana

New member
Joined
Mar 17, 2020
Messages
5
Explain 3 different ways that you could use fact fluency to solve the following multiplication: 45x16.
 
90*8 = 720
(9*5)(4*4) = (9*4)(5*4)= 36*20 = 720
45*16 = (9*5)*16= 9*(5*16) = 9*80 = 720

Finally a topic I really shine in.
 
so you're fluent in fact fluency?
Well I am certainly not fluent in English. In fact it was about 15 years ago that I realized that I do know a language. That language is mathematics.

When it comes to doing mental addition, subtraction or multiplication I hardly ever do the precise problem I need to figure out but rather I convert it an easier one and solve that one instead.
 
Here's one. Compute 37^2 - 36^2 in your head. From previous post by Dr Peterson I know that he could do this. Lets hear from others.
 
Here's one. Compute 37^2 - 36^2 in your head. From previous post by Dr Peterson I know that he could do this. Lets hear from others.
Is this what you are after? My internet search didn't really give me a straightforward idea.
I'd simply factor it: [math]37^2 - 36^2 = (37 - 36)(37 + 36) = 1 \cdot 73 = 73[/math].

FYI: I'm (con)fluent in English and Quantum Mechanics.

-Dan
 
Here's one. Compute 37^2 - 36^2 in your head. From previous post by Dr Peterson I know that he could do this. Lets hear from others.
Difference of two squares I can do in my head. More complicated than that, I need tools.
 
Here's one. Compute 37^2 - 36^2 in your head. From previous post by Dr Peterson I know that he could do this. Lets hear from others.
[MATH](a+1)^2-a^2=2a+1[/MATH]Thus the difference between two consecutive squares [MATH]a^2[/MATH] and [MATH](a+1)^2[/MATH] is equal to [MATH]2a+1[/MATH].
[MATH]37^2-36^2=2×36+1=73[/MATH]
 
[MATH](a+1)^2-a^2=2a+1[/MATH]Thus the difference between two consecutive squares [MATH]a^2[/MATH] and [MATH](a+1)^2[/MATH] is equal to [MATH]2a+1[/MATH].
[MATH]37^2-36^2=2×36+1=73[/MATH]
Or 37+36 = 73.
 
Can you generate pythagorean triples where two sides differ by 1? What is the algorithm?
 
Can you generate pythagorean triples where two sides differ by 1? What is the algorithm?
There is only one where the sides differ by 1: 3, 4, 5.

For the rest, solve [math]a^2 + b^2 = (b + 1)^2 \implies b = \dfrac{a^2 - 1}{2}[/math]. For example, with a = 5 you get b = 12. (Note that a must be odd for this to work. I can't say if there are any triples for an even a.)

-Dan
 
3^2 = 5^2 - 4^2----3, 4, 5
5^2 = 13^2 - 12^2----5, 12, 13
7^2 = 25^2-24^2-----7, 24, 25
9^2 = 41^2-40^2-----9, 40, 41
....
If n=2k+1, (2k+1)^2 = (k+1)^2-k^2.

If n is even, this can't be done.
 
Can you generate pythagorean triples where two sides differ by 1? What is the algorithm?

About 10 years ago, I thought of doing that in an effort to look for rational approximations for \(\sqrt{2}\) and wound up "discovering" the Pell sequence:

[MATH]P_{n}=2P_{n-1}+P_{n-2}[/MATH] where \(P_1=1,P_2=2\).

Then you can use any two consecutive members of the sequence to generate Pythagorean triples whose legs differ by 1. :)
 
I guess that I took over this thread. Sorry. But we are having fun.
Since you mentioned sqt(2) I thought of how that is a constructible number. Does anyone know how to construct sqrt(n), where n is a positive integer, using a straight edge and compass?
 
3^2 = 5^2 - 4^2----3, 4, 5
5^2 = 13^2 - 12^2----5, 12, 13
7^2 = 25^2-24^2-----7, 24, 25
9^2 = 41^2-40^2-----9, 40, 41
....
If n=2k+1, (2k+1)^2 = (k+1)^2-k^2.

If n is even, this can't be done.
If n=2k+1, (2k+1)^2 = (k+1)^2-k^2 is total nonsense!

If n=2k + 1, then (2k+1)^2 = 4k^2 + 4k + 1 = (2k^2 + 2k + 1)^2 - (2k^2 + 2k)^2
 
Top