Hey,
I've got a quick math question, but I'm not sure if the logic is valid. Does:
a^(b*c) = d^(e*c) ?
Testing it with numbers, it seemed to work, but I'd like more knowledgeable confirmationdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Stick out tongue :p :p"
Now for Euler's identity, something doesn't rationalize well with me:
e^(i)(pi) = -1
This was apparently derived from:
e^(i)(pi) = cos(pi) + isin(pi)
Where cos(pi) = -1 and sin(pi) = 0
But if that's the case, then doesn't the make i irrelevant? Couldn't any value be replaced with that to obtain the same value since it is being multiplied by 0? If:
e^(x)(pi) = -1 + x(0), then that implied to me at least that e^anything*pi = -1
I've got a quick math question, but I'm not sure if the logic is valid. Does:
a^(b*c) = d^(e*c) ?
Testing it with numbers, it seemed to work, but I'd like more knowledgeable confirmation
Now for Euler's identity, something doesn't rationalize well with me:
e^(i)(pi) = -1
This was apparently derived from:
e^(i)(pi) = cos(pi) + isin(pi)
Where cos(pi) = -1 and sin(pi) = 0
But if that's the case, then doesn't the make i irrelevant? Couldn't any value be replaced with that to obtain the same value since it is being multiplied by 0? If:
e^(x)(pi) = -1 + x(0), then that implied to me at least that e^anything*pi = -1