explain why a quadratic equation can't have one imaginary number
That is a
VERY good question.
Look at the quadratic formula: \(\displaystyle ax^2 + bx + c \implies x = \dfrac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a} = \dfrac{-b}{2a} \pm \sqrt{\dfrac{b^2 - 4ac}{4a^2}}.\) With me so far?
\(\displaystyle But \dfrac{-b}{2a}\ is\ just\ one\ single\ number;\ call\ it\ d.\)
\(\displaystyle And \dfrac{b^2 - 4ac}{4a^2}\ is\ also\ just\ one\ single\ number;\ call\ it\ e^2.\)
\(\displaystyle So\ x = d \pm \sqrt{e^2} \implies x = d + e\ or\ x = d - e.\)
\(\displaystyle e^2 = 0 \implies \sqrt{0} = 0 \implies x = d + 0 = d\ or\ x = d - 0 = d\ so\ x = d.\ ONE\ answer\ if\ e^2 = 0.\)
\(\displaystyle e^2 \ne 0 \implies d + e \ne d - e\ so\ TWO\ different\ possible\ answers\ if\ e^2 \ne 0.\) Right?
\(\displaystyle e^2 < 0 \implies e\ is\ "imaginary"\ and \ne 0 \implies d + e \ne d - e\ \implies\ two\ DIFFERENT\ imaginary\ numbers\ are\ possible\ answers.\)
Plus and minus lead to two different possible roots of a quadratic unless e
2 = 0. If e
2 > 0, both roots are real. If e
2 < 0, both roots are complex (meaning that they include an "imaginary" part). Make sense now?
PS Looking at PKA's and Hall's posts, I see I should have made clear that I was talking about a quadratic with real coefficients. I tend to make the dangerous assumption that we are dealing with real numbers unless it is disclosed otherwise.