mnkrebs said:
I am trying to solve using the elimination method
7r-3s=35
3r+7s=73
Do I multiply the first equation by 3 and the second equation by 7? I am using these numbers based on the fact that 21 is the lowest multiplier of 3 and 7.
You certainly COULD multiply the first equation by 3 and the second equation by 7:
3*(7r - 3s) = 3*35
7*(3r + 7s) = 7*73
The resulting equations would be these:
21r - 9s = 105
21r + 49s = 511
Do you see that you would need to SUBTRACT one equation from the other in order to eliminate the "r" terms (because 21r - 21r = 0r)
I'd suggest it might be easier to note that the "s" terms in the original problem already have opposite signs. If we could make the coefficients of "s" into opposites, then we could just add the equations together and eliminate the "s" terms. Since most people make fewer mistakes with adding equations together than they do when they're subtracting equations, this might be a better approach.
We could multiply the first equation by 7, and the second by 3:
7*(7r - 3s) = 7*35
3(3r + 7s) = 3*73
Here are the new equations:
49r - 21s = 245
9r + 21s = 219
Now, simply adding the two equations together will eliminate the "s" terms:
49r - 21s = 245
9r + 21s = 219
-----------------
58r + 0s = 464
or,
58r = 464
You should easily be able to find the value of "r". Once you have the value for "r", substitute it into one of the original equations and solve for "s".
Your way will work, too, of course....as long as you don't make an error when subtracting.