Ok, so it’s not good terminology ? Instead, better terminology would be “Figure
A’s sides are 5x as large than another shape’s sides” or “Figure A’s area is 5x as large than another shape’s”? If I were to receive this problem online “How many times large is Figure A than Figure B?”, shall I answer it by sides or area?
I agree with your alternative versions.
But the "how many times as large" question depends on context. In a test about similar figures, I would tend to guess it meant the scale factor, which is the ratio of sides. But if anything in the context suggested a focus on area, my mind would switch over to that.
(Also be careful about whether it says "how many times
as large" or "how many times
larger"; that verges on idiom, where some people go with what it literally says, while others go with what ordinary people mean by it -- even many textbook authors. What you wrote here, "how many times
large", teeters between the two, and is meaningless as written. Your original "5x as large
than" was similarly bad English.)
I fully agree with tkhunny's recommendation of stating your assumptions, which is a good idea even when you don't think a problem is at all ambiguous! (Sometimes you just don't see something the same way someone else does, because of your own context.)