Hi,
I have been studying calculus on the topic 'volume of solids of revolution' which basically goes over finding volumes through cylinders with the formula V= the integral of πy^2dx. But that doesn't matter as such; it's more of a quier over a question. "Find the volume of the solid of revolution formed when the curve y=x^2+2 is rotated around the x-axis from x=1 to x=2."
Now my first thought was to do the "inverse chain rule" or chain rule with integrals, but supposedly that is wrong as it is not a linear function. Instead, we were to expand it, getting the answer of 293π/15 u^3 (units cubed, as it is volume being measured). But using the inverse chain got you 27/2π. These are completely different answers.
So overall question: can someone explain why the inverse chain rule only works with linear functions in regards to this question?
Many thanks,
Arrows
I have been studying calculus on the topic 'volume of solids of revolution' which basically goes over finding volumes through cylinders with the formula V= the integral of πy^2dx. But that doesn't matter as such; it's more of a quier over a question. "Find the volume of the solid of revolution formed when the curve y=x^2+2 is rotated around the x-axis from x=1 to x=2."
Now my first thought was to do the "inverse chain rule" or chain rule with integrals, but supposedly that is wrong as it is not a linear function. Instead, we were to expand it, getting the answer of 293π/15 u^3 (units cubed, as it is volume being measured). But using the inverse chain got you 27/2π. These are completely different answers.
So overall question: can someone explain why the inverse chain rule only works with linear functions in regards to this question?
Many thanks,
Arrows