BigBeachBanana
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2021
- Messages
- 2,274
Can you draw a line, that is not necessarily straight, such that it will divide the figure below into 2 identical parts?
View attachment 31813
Two fishes. Left one looks right. Right one looks up.Can you draw a line, that is not necessarily straight, such that it will divide the figure below into 2 identical parts?
View attachment 31813
I would count again.The total area is 12. Half of the area is 6. The rest is easy.
After getting his doctorate, he Steve forgot to count....he starts counting from 3I would count again.
Were you just trying to see if I would count again? Well I did, and I still get 12 square units. Am I really wrong?I would count again.
It is called the PhD syndrome. PhD = permanent head damage.After getting his doctorate, he Steve forgot to count....he starts counting from 3
The total area is 12. Half of the area is 6. The rest is easy.
You're correct Steve, it was me who can't count.Were you just trying to see if I would count again? Well I did, and I still get 12 square units. Am I really wrong?
Did you want me to say that the total area in Blue is 12?
Everbody else understood it."Easy" for whom!? Your third sentence does not follow from the information
given before it.
You spoiled it...Almost had him !!!!You're correct Steve, it was me who can't count.
I can count up to 15, so don't try to make fun of me.You spoiled it...Almost had him !!!!
Everbody else understood it.
Come on, to make the two pieces exactly the same the two areas have to be the same. They need to both be 6. I counted the top left until I got 6 pieces. Then I was able to verify that they looked the same. Sure, I saw Dr Peterson's solution but I found 6 on my own and I counted 6 connected pieces. Why would I act as if I solved this problem on my own if I got it from someone else from the forum?The rest may be "easy" if you are given a/the solution in a spoiler to look
at, and then pretend as if you came up with that solution yourself. Looking at
someone else's solution and then claiming, in part, after the fact, that
"the rest is easy" is not sensible.
Come on, to make the two pieces exactly the same the two areas have to be the same. They need to both be 6. I counted the top left until I got 6 pieces. Then I was able to verify that they looked the same. Sure, I saw Dr Peterson's solution but I found 6 on my own and I counted 6 connected pieces.
It was easy for Steve, once he realized the area approach. (Those are his sentences.)"Easy" for whom!? Your third sentence does not follow
Me, too: Master of AdditionPhD = permanent head damage …
I do not have a PhD. I have a MA in math