Confirming an iff condition of Hausdorffness of locally convex TVS

zzzhhh2

New member
Joined
Aug 16, 2020
Messages
6
I am reading a lecture note on topological vector space: https://people.math.gatech.edu/~heil/6338/summer08/section9d.pdf

In Exercise E.17 on page 345, the author gives an iff condition of Hausdorffness. But I think the condition can be relaxed a little bit, that is, for any [MATH]x \ne 0[/MATH], there is an [MATH]\alpha\in J[/MATH] s.t. [MATH]\rho_\alpha(x)\ne0[/MATH]. To put in another way, we could have a seminorm taking nonzero value at zero, as long as at other points the above condition holds. Not very self-confident at math, I need a confirmation if I am right (no need to prove, just tell me if I am correct). Thank you.
 
I don't see the statement to which you have reference.
However. a top-space is said to be Hausdorff iff any two points are separated by disjoint basic open sets.
SEE HERE
 
I don't see the statement to which you have reference.
However. a top-space is said to be Hausdorff iff any two points are separated by disjoint basic open sets.
SEE HERE
I don't understand what you mean. I give the link to the pdf (can you open it?) I give the page, I give "Exercise E.17". What do you mean by "I don't see the statement to which you have reference"?
 
I don't understand what you mean. I give the link to the pdf (can you open it?) I give the page, I give "Exercise E.17". What do you mean by "I don't see the statement to which you have reference"?
Sorry, but I do like read from a linked document. I like working this sort of question.
If you really need help, please type the question out. Please be as complete as possible.
 
Sorry, but I do like read from a linked document. I like working this sort of question.
If you really need help, please type the question out. Please be as complete as possible.
If you do like reading from a linked document, why don't you just go ahead and read it instead of asking me to type it?
 
Top