complex infinite series

logistic_guy

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2024
Messages
1,610
here is the question

Use multiplication of series to show that ezz(z2+1)=1z+112z56z2+ (0<z<1)\displaystyle \frac{e^z}{z(z^2 + 1)} = \frac{1}{z} + 1 - \frac{1}{2}z - \frac{5}{6}z^2 + \cdots \ (0 < |z| < 1).


my attemb
i think it want me to find infinite series for ez\displaystyle e^z and 1z\displaystyle \frac{1}{z} and 1z2+1\displaystyle \frac{1}{z^2 + 1} then multiply them together
i know how to find taylor series for ez\displaystyle e^z
but i don't know how to find series for 1z\displaystyle \frac{1}{z} and 1z2+1\displaystyle \frac{1}{z^2 + 1}☹️
 
You can leave 1/z 1/z as it is. For 1/(1+z2) 1/(1+z^2) use long division or look it up on Wolfram Alpha, or build the Taylor series by differentiations.
 
You can leave 1/z 1/z as it is. For 1/(1+z2) 1/(1+z^2) use long division or look it up on Wolfram Alpha, or build the Taylor series by differentiations.
i don't understand what you mean by long division
how to do division when i've only 1\displaystyle 1 in the numator?:rolleyes:
i thought long division is done when the numator have higher degree
 
i don't understand what you mean by long division
how to do division when i've only 1\displaystyle 1 in the numator?:rolleyes:
i thought long division is done when the numator have higher degree
Google polynomial division.

-Dan
 
i don't understand what you mean by long division
how to do division when i've only 1\displaystyle 1 in the numator?:rolleyes:
i thought long division is done when the numator have higher degree

I don't care. Nike: Just do it!

1:(1+z2)=1z2+z4 etc.(1+z2)z2(z2z4)z4(z4+z6)z6etc.\begin{array}{lll} 1:(1+z^2)=1 - z^2 + z^4\mp \text{ etc.}\\[6pt] -(1+z^2)\\[6pt] ----------\\[6pt] -z^2\\[6pt] -(-z^2-z^4)\\[6pt] -------------\\[6pt] z^4\\[6pt] -(z^4+z^6)\\[6pt] -------------\\[6pt] -z^6\\[6pt] \text{etc.} \end{array}
The only thing that cannot be divided by is zero.
 
Last edited:
Google polynomial division.

-Dan
i know how to do it but not with 1\displaystyle 1 in the numator

I don't care. Nike: Just do it!

1:(1+z2)=1z2+z4 etc.(1+z2)z2(z2z4)z4(z4+z6)z6etc.\begin{array}{lll} 1:(1+z^2)=1 - z^2 + z^4\mp \text{ etc.}\\[6pt] -(1+z^2)\\[6pt] ----------\\[6pt] -z^2\\[6pt] -(-z^2-z^4)\\[6pt] -------------\\[6pt] z^4\\[6pt] -(z^4+z^6)\\[6pt] -------------\\[6pt] -z^6\\[6pt] \text{etc.} \end{array}
The only thing that cannot be divided by is zero.
why the first step in the long division, you divide 1\displaystyle 1 by 1\displaystyle 1 and not 1\displaystyle 1 by z2\displaystyle z^2?
 
i know how to do it but not with 1\displaystyle 1 in the numator


why the first step in the long division, you divide 1\displaystyle 1 by 1\displaystyle 1 and not 1\displaystyle 1 by z2\displaystyle z^2?
Honestly. You've never seen this before? Have you taken a course in complex Calculus?

-Dan
 
i know how to do it but not with 1\displaystyle 1 in the numator


why the first step in the long division, you divide 1\displaystyle 1 by 1\displaystyle 1 and not 1\displaystyle 1 by z2\displaystyle z^2?
Yes, because diving by z2 z^2 leads nowhere. The division by 1 1 keeps it going. I can divide by whatever I want to, except zero, of course.

You can also formalize it by the Euclidean algorithm:
1=1(1+z2)z2z2=z2(1+z2)+z4z4=z4(1+z2)z6z6=z6(1+z2)+z8etc.\begin{array}{lll} 1&=1\cdot (1+z^2) - z^2\\[6pt] -z^2&=-z^2\cdot (1+z^2) +z^4\\[6pt] z^4&=z^4\cdot (1+z^2)-z^6\\[6pt] -z^6&=-z^6\cdot (1+z^2) +z^8\\[6pt] \text{etc.} \end{array}but the long division is easier and more known. The algorithm of dividing a polynomial p(z) p(z) by a polynomial q(z) q(z)
is always p(z)=s(z)q(z)+r(z) p(z)=s(z)\cdot q(z)+r(z) no matter what p(z),q(z) p(z),q(z) are. The example is a bit of a downside-up procedure in this specific case since the degree of r(z) r(z) becomes larger rather than smaller. This means mathematically that the series is only a valid approximation for small values of z z around z=0. z=0.

If you look at the thread you might observe that I already changed from your z2+1 z^2+1 in post #1 to my 1+z2 1+z^2 in post #2. That was on purpose!

In case you insist of the usual measure that the degree of the remainder r(z) r(z) in Euclid's algorithm becomes smaller and smaller, then you have to transform the variable z1/x z \mapsto 1/x and divide
11+z2=11+1x2=1x2+1x2=x2x2+1 \dfrac{1}{1+z^2}=\dfrac{1}{1+\dfrac{1}{x^2}}=\dfrac{1}{\dfrac{x^2+1}{x^2}}=\dfrac{x^2}{x^2+1} instead and re-transform it by x1/z x\mapsto 1/z afterward. I simply avoided these unnecessary steps by dividing 1:(1+z2). 1:(1+z^2).
 
Last edited:
Honestly. You've never seen this before? Have you taken a course in complex Calculus?

-Dan
i seen it but i don't think to calculate it🙁

Yes, because diving by z2 z^2 leads nowhere. The division by 1 1 keeps it going. I can divide by whatever I want to, except zero, of course.

You can also formalize it by the Euclidean algorithm:
1=1(1+z2)z2z2=z2(1+z2)+z4z4=z4(1+z2)z6z6=z6(1+z2)+z8etc.\begin{array}{lll} 1&=1\cdot (1+z^2) - z^2\\[6pt] -z^2&=-z^2\cdot (1+z^2) +z^4\\[6pt] z^4&=z^4\cdot (1+z^2)-z^6\\[6pt] -z^6&=-z^6\cdot (1+z^2) +z^8\\[6pt] \text{etc.} \end{array}but the long division is easier and more known. The algorithm of dividing a polynomial p(z) p(z) by a polynomial q(z) q(z)
is always p(z)=s(z)q(z)+r(z) p(z)=s(z)\cdot q(z)+r(z) no matter what p(z),q(z) p(z),q(z) are. The example is a bit of a downside-up procedure in this specific case since the degree of r(z) r(z) becomes larger rather than smaller. This means mathematically that the series is only a valid approximation for small values of z z around z=0. z=0.

If you look at the thread you might observe that I already changed from your z2+1 z^2+1 in post #1 to my 1+z2 1+z^2 in post #2. That was on purpose!

In case you insist of the usual measure that the degree of the remainder r(z) r(z) in Euclid's algorithm becomes smaller and smaller, then you have to transform the variable z1/x z \mapsto 1/x and divide
11+z2=11+1x2=1x2+1x2=x2x2+1 \dfrac{1}{1+z^2}=\dfrac{1}{1+\dfrac{1}{x^2}}=\dfrac{1}{\dfrac{x^2+1}{x^2}}=\dfrac{x^2}{x^2+1} instead and re-transform it by x1/z x\mapsto 1/z afterward. I simply avoided these unnecessary steps by dividing 1:(1+z2). 1:(1+z^2).
thank for this information. i've a point and i want to emphasize on it

you say
I can divide by whatever I want to, except zero, of course.
if i divide by z2\displaystyle z^2 i get

1z2+1=1z21z4+1z6\displaystyle \frac{1}{z^2 + 1} = \frac{1}{z^2} - \frac{1}{z^4} + \frac{1}{z^6} - \cdots

if i divide by 1\displaystyle 1 i get

1z2+1=1z2+z4\displaystyle \frac{1}{z^2 + 1} = 1 - z^2 + z^4 - \cdots

why there's two different series and how to know i must chose the second series?😣
 
Your series approximates the quotient at z= z=\infty i.e. for very large values, mine approximates the quotient around z=0. z=0. Since you want to multiply three series, you should consider the same ranges. You can also use
1/z=n=0(1)n(1+z)n 1/z = \sum_{n=0}^\infty (-1)^n (-1 + z)^n for 1+z<1 |-1+z|<1 if you want to avoid any powers of z z with negative exponents which I assumed.
 
You think going back and looking at complex series is embarrassing, too?

-Dan
not really☹️

Your series approximates the quotient at z= z=\infty i.e. for very large values, mine approximates the quotient around z=0. z=0. Since you want to multiply three series, you should consider the same ranges. You can also use
1/z=n=0(1)n(1+z)n 1/z = \sum_{n=0}^\infty (-1)^n (-1 + z)^n for 1+z<1 |-1+z|<1 if you want to avoid any powers of z z with negative exponents which I assumed.
how many terms do i take from each infinie series
1z=1+1z+=2z+\displaystyle \frac{1}{z} = 1 + 1 - z + \cdots = 2 - z + \cdots
 
The question looks as if my post #2 was correct and you don't need a series for 1/z. 1/z. You need powers from 1 -1 to 2, 2, so I would use the first three terms of the series from ex e^x and 1/(1+z2). 1/(1+z^2).
 
The question looks as if my post #2 was correct and you don't need a series for 1/z. 1/z. You need powers from 1 -1 to 2, 2, so I would use the first three terms of the series from ex e^x and 1/(1+z2). 1/(1+z^2).
ezz(z2+1)=1z(1+z+z22+)(1z2+z4+)\displaystyle \frac{e^z}{z(z^2 + 1)} = \frac{1}{z}(1 + z + \frac{z^2}{2} + \cdots)(1 - z^2 + z^4 + \cdots)

=(1z+1+z2+)(1z2+z4+)\displaystyle = (\frac{1}{z} + 1 + \frac{z}{2} + \cdots)(1 - z^2 + z^4 + \cdots)

=1zz+z3+1z2+z4+z2z32+z52+\displaystyle = \frac{1}{z} - z + z^3 + 1 - z^2 + z^4 + \frac{z}{2} - \frac{z^3}{2} + \frac{z^5}{2} + \cdots

this don't look like the op☹️where my mistake?😣
 
ezz(z2+1)=1z(1+z+z22+)(1z2+z4+)\displaystyle \frac{e^z}{z(z^2 + 1)} = \frac{1}{z}(1 + z + \frac{z^2}{2} + \cdots)(1 - z^2 + z^4 + \cdots)

=(1z+1+z2+)(1z2+z4+)\displaystyle = (\frac{1}{z} + 1 + \frac{z}{2} + \cdots)(1 - z^2 + z^4 + \cdots)

=1zz+z3+1z2+z4+z2z32+z52+\displaystyle = \frac{1}{z} - z + z^3 + 1 - z^2 + z^4 + \frac{z}{2} - \frac{z^3}{2} + \frac{z^5}{2} + \cdots

this don't look like the op☹️where my mistake?😣

You gave up too early (a), it is necessary to consider the first four terms of the product series (b), and you should pair the terms by powers of z z (c). If you do all these then you will get

ez1+z2=(k=0zkk!)(j=0(1)jz2j)=n=0(k+j=n(1)jk!zk+2j)=(0,0)+[(0,1)+(1,0)]+[(0,2)+(1,1)+(2,0)]+[(0,3)+(1,2)+(2,1)+(3,0)]+=1+[z2+z]+[z4z3+12z2]+[z6+z512z4+16z3]+=1+z12z256z3±ezz(1+z2)=1z+112z56z2±\begin{array}{lll} \dfrac{e^z}{1+z^2}&=\left(\displaystyle{\sum_{k=0}^\infty \dfrac{z^k}{k!}}\right) \cdot \left(\displaystyle{\sum_{j=0}^\infty (-1)^{j}z^{2j}}\right)\\[24pt] &=\displaystyle{\sum_{n=0}^\infty \left(\sum_{k+j=n}\dfrac{(-1)^j}{k!}z^{k+2j}\right)}\\[24pt] &=(0,0)+\left[(0,1)+(1,0)\right]+\left[(0,2)+(1,1)+(2,0)\right]+\left[(0,3)+(1,2)+(2,1)+(3,0)\right]+\ldots\\[20pt] &=1+\left[-z^2+z\right]+\left[z^4-z^3+\dfrac{1}{2}z^2\right]+ \left[-z^6+z^5-\dfrac{1}{2}z^{4}+\dfrac{1}{6}z^3 \right]+\ldots \\[20pt] &=1+z-\dfrac{1}{2}z^2 -\dfrac{5}{6}z^3\pm\ldots\\[24pt] \dfrac{e^z}{z(1+z^2)}&=\dfrac{1}{z}+1-\dfrac{1}{2}z-\dfrac{5}{6}z^2\pm\ldots \end{array}
 
You gave up too early (a), it is necessary to consider the first four terms of the product series (b), and you should pair the terms by powers of z z (c). If you do all these then you will get
you tell me only to use three terms 😭

you've a nice solution over there.
i'll try to use 4\displaystyle 4 terms this time and i'll try to simplify

ezz(z2+1)=1z(1+z+z22+z36+)(1z2+z4z6+)\displaystyle \frac{e^z}{z(z^2 + 1)} = \frac{1}{z}(1 + z + \frac{z^2}{2} + \frac{z^3}{6} + \cdots)(1 - z^2 + z^4 - z^6 + \cdots)

=(1z+1+z2+z26+)(1z2+z4z6+)\displaystyle = (\frac{1}{z} + 1 + \frac{z}{2} + \frac{z^2}{6} + \cdots)(1 - z^2 + z^4 - z^6 + \cdots)

=1zz+z3z5+1z2+z4z6+z2z32+z52z72+z26z46+z66z86+\displaystyle = \frac{1}{z} - z + z^3 - z^5 + 1 - z^2 + z^4 - z^6 + \frac{z}{2} - \frac{z^3}{2} + \frac{z^5}{2} - \frac{z^7}{2} + \frac{z^2}{6} - \frac{z^4}{6} + \frac{z^6}{6} - \frac{z^8}{6} + \cdots

i'll simplify up to degree 2\displaystyle 2

=1zz+1z2+z2+z26+\displaystyle = \frac{1}{z} - z + 1 - z^2 + \frac{z}{2} + \frac{z^2}{6} + \cdots

=1z+12z2+z26z26+z26+\displaystyle = \frac{1}{z} + 1 - \frac{2z}{2} + \frac{z}{2} - \frac{6z^2}{6} + \frac{z^2}{6} + \cdots

=1z+1z25z26+\displaystyle = \frac{1}{z} + 1 - \frac{z}{2} - \frac{5z^2}{6} + \cdots

i get it correct this time😭what a lovely day

thank fresh_42 very much🙏
 
you tell me only to use three terms 😭
I used only three terms of the original series. But to get all combinations up to z2 z^2 we need z3 z^3 before multiplying with 1/z 1/z and that means all index combinations from (0,0) (0,0) to (0,3),,(3,0) (0,3),\ldots,(3,0) so counting zero makes four. Sorry.
 
I used only three terms of the original series. But to get all combinations up to z2 z^2 we need z3 z^3 before multiplying with 1/z 1/z and that means all index combinations from (0,0) (0,0) to (0,3),,(3,0) (0,3),\ldots,(3,0) so counting zero makes four. Sorry.
you're super

appreciate it🙏
 
Top