Can you check if this is correct?

Joey29

New member
Joined
Dec 31, 2005
Messages
12
Hey, can anyone check if this is done properly? I'm trying to find out where the function is concave up or down. Can you check if this is correct (method & math)?


k(x) = -2x^3 (x-4)
k'(x)= -8x^3+24x^2

K''(x) = -24x^2+ 48x = 0
-24x^2 +48x
-24x(x+2) = 0
x= 0
x= -2

^-----inflation points, right?

----neg---neg---pos
-------- -2-----0-----
--CD------CD---CU

k''(-3)= -360..
k"(-1)= -72.00..
k"(1)= 23.99...

so it would be concave down from - infinite to -2, concave down from -2, 0 and concave up from 0 to infinite? Would that be correct? I am not certain if the procedure is legal. I appreciate any help. Can anyone sketch a graph of this fn, I sketched one on paper but I do not know how to sketch one here. It would be helpful as well to see if my graph is correct (Ignore y-intercepts).

Joe
 
G'day, Joe.

Joey29 said:
Hey, can anyone check if this is done properly? I'm trying to find out where the function is concave up or down. Can you check if this is correct (method & math)?


k(x) = -2x^3 (x-4)
k'(x)= -8x^3+24x^2

K''(x) = -24x^2+ 48x = 0
-24x^2 +48x
-24x(x+2) = 0 <- Minor error. That should be -24x(x - 2) = 0
x= 0
x= -2 So we actually have x=2

^-----inflation points, right?
We always have to check that there is indeed a change in sign of the second derivative. For example, y=x^4 has a second derivative of zero at x=0, but no change in the sign of the second derivative / concavity occurs.

The question wants us to find the intervals of concavity, so we'll find out if those are inflexion points anyway.

----neg---neg---pos
-------- -2-----0-----
--CD------CD---CU

k''(-3)= -360..
k"(-1)= -72.00..
k"(1)= 23.99...

It may be useful to format it something like:

Code:
                                     suspect inflection
                                       points     
                                     |        \ 
                                     |         \
                                    \|/        _\|
*---------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----*
|           x   |-100 | -2  | -1  |  0  |  1  |  2  |  3  | 100 |
+---------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
|Sign of k''(x) |   - |  -  |  -  |  0  |  +  |  0  |  -  |  -  |
*---------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----*


The -100 and 100 are there if we're a little unsure of ourselves.

From the chart, the function is concave down (ie. k''(x) is negative)
in \(\displaystyle (-\infty, 0)\) and \(\displaystyle (0, +\infty)\).
And concave up (ie. k''(x) is positive) in \(\displaystyle (0, 2)\).

 
Thank You!

Thanks Unco, that was a hard mistake to find yet you found it! It led to the outcome being wrong! I appreciate your help!

Joe
 
Hello, Joe!

Unco already caught your tiny error.
\(\displaystyle \;\;\;\)I'll just edit your statements.

\(\displaystyle k(x)\;=\;-2x^4\,+\,8x^3\)

\(\displaystyle k'(x)\;=\;-8x^3\,+\,24x^2\)

\(\displaystyle k''(x)\;=\;-24x^2\,+\,48x\;=\;0\)

\(\displaystyle \;\;\;-24x(x\,-\,2)\:=\:0\;\;\Rightarrow\;\;x\,=\,0,\,2\)


\(\displaystyle k''(-1)\,=\,-72,\;\;\;k(1)''\,=\,+24,\;\;\;k''(3)\,=\,-24\)

\(\displaystyle \;\;- - - 0 - - - - 2 - - -\)
. . .neg\(\displaystyle \;\;\;\;\)pos\(\displaystyle \;\;\;\;\)neg
. . . .\(\displaystyle \cap\;\;\;\;\;\cup\;\;\;\;\;\:\cap\)


Concave down on \(\displaystyle (-\infty,\,0)\) and \(\displaystyle (2,\,\infty)\)
Concave up on \(\displaystyle (0,\,2)\)


From the first derivative, we find a critical value at \(\displaystyle x = 3\)
\(\displaystyle \;\;\;\)It turns out to be a maximum at \(\displaystyle (3,\,54)\)

And we have inflection points at \(\displaystyle (0,\,0)\) and \(\displaystyle (2,\,32)\).
Code:
          |         ***
          |      *   :  *
          |     *    :    *
          |   * :    :     *
   -------*-----+----+------
      *   |     2    3      *
    *     |
   *      |
The graph probably looks like this . . .
 
More than I can ask for

Thanks Soroban! Thats more than I can ask for. You mastered the LaTex language. I can barely get a fraction over a fraction in the LaTex format. I actually worked on it for a while the other day. I even stuck paper tape to my monitor with LaTex commands like you. Thanks again! The graph was similar to the one I created on paper:)
 
Top