Hello,
In one of my lecturer's slides, he states he has used the product rule to go from one line to the next. But i am not sure how he has applied it as my understanding of the product rule is that if we were to differentiate (uv) with respect to x, we would get u(dv/dx) + v(du/dx). However the lecturer gets a coefficient of "1/2" and i think he has applied the product rule backwards or something? Can somebody please explain what he has done and how he has done it?
I am attaching a picture of the problem below.
. . . . .\(\displaystyle U_s\, \dfrac{\partial U_s}{\partial s}\, =\, -\dfrac{1}{\rho}\, \dfrac{\partial P}{\partial s}\, +\, g_s\)
Use product rule and, as gs = –g in the vertical direction:
. . . . .\(\displaystyle \dfrac{1}{2}\, \dfrac{\partial (U_s^2)}{\partial s}\, +\, \dfrac{1}{\rho}\, \dfrac{\partial P}{\partial s}\, +\, g\,\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial s}\)
I do not understand how the instructor goes from the first line above to the next.
My understanding of the product-rule formula is as follows:
. . . . .\(\displaystyle \dfrac{d}{dx}(uv)\, =\, v\, \cdot\, \dfrac{du}{dx}\, +\, u\, \cdot\, \dfrac{dv}{dx}\)
In this case, how does the first term go from this:
. . . . .\(\displaystyle U_s\, \dfrac{\partial U_s}{\partial s}\)
...to this:
. . . . .\(\displaystyle \dfrac{1}{2}\, \dfrac{\partial (U_s^2)}{\partial s}\)
Thank you very much in advance for your help and explanation.
Regards,
Ahsan
In one of my lecturer's slides, he states he has used the product rule to go from one line to the next. But i am not sure how he has applied it as my understanding of the product rule is that if we were to differentiate (uv) with respect to x, we would get u(dv/dx) + v(du/dx). However the lecturer gets a coefficient of "1/2" and i think he has applied the product rule backwards or something? Can somebody please explain what he has done and how he has done it?
I am attaching a picture of the problem below.
. . . . .\(\displaystyle U_s\, \dfrac{\partial U_s}{\partial s}\, =\, -\dfrac{1}{\rho}\, \dfrac{\partial P}{\partial s}\, +\, g_s\)
Use product rule and, as gs = –g in the vertical direction:
. . . . .\(\displaystyle \dfrac{1}{2}\, \dfrac{\partial (U_s^2)}{\partial s}\, +\, \dfrac{1}{\rho}\, \dfrac{\partial P}{\partial s}\, +\, g\,\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial s}\)
I do not understand how the instructor goes from the first line above to the next.
My understanding of the product-rule formula is as follows:
. . . . .\(\displaystyle \dfrac{d}{dx}(uv)\, =\, v\, \cdot\, \dfrac{du}{dx}\, +\, u\, \cdot\, \dfrac{dv}{dx}\)
In this case, how does the first term go from this:
. . . . .\(\displaystyle U_s\, \dfrac{\partial U_s}{\partial s}\)
...to this:
. . . . .\(\displaystyle \dfrac{1}{2}\, \dfrac{\partial (U_s^2)}{\partial s}\)
Thank you very much in advance for your help and explanation.
Regards,
Ahsan
Attachments
Last edited by a moderator: