Assassin315
New member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2010
- Messages
- 12
I've already done what I presume to be the main part of this problem, and I'm left with proving the following:
This probably isn't as hard as I'm making it, but maybe someone will quickly correct me where I've gone wrong.
I set u = a^(2/3) - x^(2/3), meaning du = (-2/3)x^(-1/3) dx, or du = -2/(3*(x^(1/3))) dx. Thus, dx = (3*x^(1/3))/2 du.
This leaves me with the integral of u^3 du over the specified boundary. The integral of u^3 is u^4/4 -- and so (a^(2/3) - x^(2/3)^4)/4) after subbing u back in -- and I multiplied that by my du. In the end, I got a simplified version. However, if I try to integrate it from 0 to a, my bounds are either equal to 0 or... don't exist. What'd I mess up on?
This probably isn't as hard as I'm making it, but maybe someone will quickly correct me where I've gone wrong.
I set u = a^(2/3) - x^(2/3), meaning du = (-2/3)x^(-1/3) dx, or du = -2/(3*(x^(1/3))) dx. Thus, dx = (3*x^(1/3))/2 du.
This leaves me with the integral of u^3 du over the specified boundary. The integral of u^3 is u^4/4 -- and so (a^(2/3) - x^(2/3)^4)/4) after subbing u back in -- and I multiplied that by my du. In the end, I got a simplified version. However, if I try to integrate it from 0 to a, my bounds are either equal to 0 or... don't exist. What'd I mess up on?