carlos1017
New member
- Joined
- May 13, 2015
- Messages
- 6
Try using (1+x)^n=1+nx+2!n(n−1)x^2+3!n(n−1)(n−2)x^3 where x=2 and n=1/3Question: Find the sum of the first 4 terms of the binomial expansion (1+2)1/3
I tried using the Binomial Theorem formula:
View attachment 5309
But I'm not sure how to do factorial fractions (that is if its even possible). Maybe you're not suppose to use the Binomial Theorem?
Thanks!
Is this the entire problem?
Actually the sum is to infinity but if n is a positive integer, all terms after the nth one are zero. So, if we write out the binomial coefficient (and use a as a generic value instead of n) we haveQuestion: Find the sum of the first 4 terms of the binomial expansion (1+2)1/3
I tried using the Binomial Theorem formula:
View attachment 5309
But I'm not sure how to do factorial fractions (that is if its even possible). Maybe you're not suppose to use the Binomial Theorem?
Thanks!
Try using (1+x)^n=1+nx+2!n(n−1)x^2+3!n(n−1)(n−2)x^3 where x=2 and n=1/3
Actually the sum is to infinity but if n is a positive integer, all terms after the nth one are zero. So, if we write out the binomial coefficient (and use a as a generic value instead of n) we have
\(\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix}a\\0\end{pmatrix}\, =\, 1\)
\(\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix}a\\k\end{pmatrix}\, =\, \frac{a\, (a-1)\, (a-2)\, ...\, (a-k+1)}{k!}\)
I'm not really sure where Jomo came up with his sum, nor do I know what 159/9 signifies. However, I have an alternate solution, which may or may not be any easier for you. The difficulty is that the exponent is a fraction. The binomial theorem involves a sum from k = 0 to n. But here n is a fraction, and I don't believe the sigma operator takes fractional bounds. My solution is to rewrite the problem, such that the exponent is no longer a fraction, like so:
\(\displaystyle 3^{\frac{1}{3}}=\left(3^{\frac{1}{6}}\right)^2\)
And then you can apply the binomial theorem, with n = 2, a = 1, and b = 3^(1/6) - 1, and everything will work out fine. I believe you can use any positive values of a and b as long as they add up to the sixth root of 3, but I choose a = 1 for simplicity's sake. Do note, though, that neither a nor b can be zero.
Right aC0 is 1, but n in this problem is not a positive integer that's why i'm confused, is there a way to evaluate 1/3C5? (i'm not sure if that'll work either)
Also, n choose k is n!/k!(n-k)!
Hi, I am not sure why ksdhart is prolonging things here. You were given the formula to find the 1st four terms which you used. I did not check to see if it comes out to 159/9 or not but again the formula is correct.Question: Find the sum of the first 4 terms of the binomial expansion (1+2)1/3
I tried using the Binomial Theorem formula:
View attachment 5309
But I'm not sure how to do factorial fractions (that is if its even possible). Maybe you're not suppose to use the Binomial Theorem?
Thanks!
Question: Find the sum of the first 4 terms of the binomial expansion (1+2)1/3
I tried using the Binomial Theorem formula:
View attachment 5309
But I'm not sure how to do factorial fractions (that is if its even possible). Maybe you're not suppose to use the Binomial Theorem?
Thanks!
Hi, I am not sure why ksdhart is prolonging things here. You were given the formula to find the 1st four terms which you used. I did not check to see if it comes out to 159/9 or not but again the formula is correct.
Hmm. I didn't see that part of your problem at first. Since the problem does specify you need to have four terms, then I'm at a loss as to how to proceed. I was able to work the problem out and arrive at the correct answer, but my sum has only three terms. Perhaps someone else can help you more.
You are definitely correct about not being able to evalulate (-1)! The factorial function handles only positive values. Fractional values can be solved, but I'd leave it to a computer because you'd need to evaluate an improper integral. And you likely don't even know an integral is, much less how to evaluate one
EDIT: So I just thought of this. What if you used n = 3, a = 1, and b = 3^(1/9)-1. Because 3^(1/9) cubed is 3^(1/3). That way you would be able to have 4 terms, since the final term would be 3C3. I haven't actually worked this out myself, but it seems plausible.
I am not sure why ksdhart is prolonging things here.