Allowable calculator tasks....

edt966

New member
Joined
Dec 15, 2005
Messages
9
This is from an open book quiz: I'm stuck because the question asks for only two choices. I have two picked out, but a third option has got me doubtful. Here goes:

For which tasks should a student be allowed to use a calculator? (Select only two)

1) Examine line symmetry. No, because this is more of a hands on geometry type of lesson example. Symmetry is synonomous with similar so examining line symmetry is more along the lines of folding paper and making even designs, using a mirror, or spinning a plotted shape around a geo-board etc.

2) Solve an algebraic equation. No, this is more of a pencil paper, "keeping the balance" of the equation as it is changed. Example: solving aX^2 + bX + c = 0. Constantly making useful or appropriate changes to each side of the equation as one progresses.

So, 1 and 2 are out by my pick.

3) Insert different values into expressions. Yes, I picked this one because a student can enter 3-(25*3)/5 = etc. They can use a calculator to check their own work to see if they got the order of operations right. Or they could be entering different values into expressions that will be graphed like 3X^2 + 2X = ? and see the effects of differing values of X .

So, I'm pretty confident on keeping 3.

Thus, I have to decide between the remaining two.

4) Plot points on a Cartesian coordinate system...or
5) Define a function relationship.

I want to go with 4) because my book mentions in a side note "Do not forget how easy it is both to plot points and draw curves on the graphing calculator..." So I thought Bingo, this must be my second choice.

But number 5) has got me second guessing. Now I kind of lean away from 5) because the calulator does not "define" the function relationship but rather it is the student who comes up with the "defined" function an can thus enter it...right? I guess I'm hung up on what does "define" mean in the context of this answer choice. Entering points on a Cartesian Coordinate system seems allowable, but very rudimenary or simple...what do you think? So, I'd say No for 5) because it is up to the student to find and "define" the function. However, I'd say Yes to 5) (because 4) is such a simple task) and also because granted it is up to the student to find the formula pattern, it could in fact be appropriate and allowable for them to enter that into a calculator and thus see functional relationships...

Ed, thanks.
 
edt966 said:
For which tasks should a student be allowed to use a calculator? (Select only two)
According to what rules should the determination be made? Calculator use is, to my knowledge, a very open issue, and I doubt a room full of educators would easily arrive at a uniform opinion on the two allowable tasks. (Note: I am not an educator; I'm just a teacher.)

edt966 said:
1) Examine line symmetry. No, because...
Or "yes", because graphing calculators are pushed as allowing students to "do deep math" without having any idea how to draw graphs.

edt966 said:
2) Solve an algebraic equation. No...
Or "yes", because symbolic software and/or programs can "release" students from the "drudgery" of the sort of "rote manipulation" involved in solving equations.

edt966 said:
3) Insert different values into expressions. Yes...
Most educators, I expect, would agree with this. Students should not be required to do arithmetic, we are told, as doing arithmetic prevents them from doing "real" mathematics.

edt966 said:
4) Plot points on a Cartesian coordinate system
This task is a big part of why educators embraced the TI-83 graphing calculator so quickly: the TABLE feature means that no student ever again has to compute plot points.

edt966 said:
5) Define a function relationship.
I'm not sure what this means. If this means "find a regression", then defintiely the answer is "yes", if for no other reason than that the computations involved quickly become impossibly complex.

I'm sorry to (probably) be so unhelpful, but from what I've read (and from what I've been told in education courses), students "should" have "access to technology" from kindergarten on. No student should "have" to do "rote memorization", "rote manipulation", "pencil and paper" "mindless" "drill-and-kill" stuff. As much as possible, "technology" should be doing everything for the students.

(This is along the lines of the philosophy that says that "soon, no student will have to learn to read or write, because speech-recognition and speech-synthesis software will do all the reading and writing for the students, releasing the students from mindless drudgery so they can get in touch with their love of language.")

For your course to be implying that there might be contexts in which students should not be allowed calculators is, well, almost heretical. Does your book give any examples in the text that might clue us in to the philosophy you're supposed to be using?

Eliz.
 
Did anyone think that Ed may be expected to form his own judgements?

The fact that he has provided supporting reasons suggests he is to form his own opinions and back them up.

This could be a tool the teacher is using to have an open discussion with his/her class on the topic.

The final answer may be: "None, no calculators in my class" or "I agree with you that ..... is awfully tedious and I won't stop you from using your calculator and getting on to the analysis".

Ed:
"Define a function relationship." may mean to determine which type of function fits some paired data best. A computer/calculator will tell you how well the data fits a particular model via a correlation coefficient. This is just one part of determining a relationship, but is certainly best left to a machine (I don't think there's any subjectivity there!). Learning how the calculator calculates the correlation coefficient is quite interesting, though.
 
Oh no, Eliz that's so depressing :cry:
I can't believe there are people out there who want to take the fun parts out of maths, arithmetic working out, graphs, etc. are all what make maths, maths! :lol:
 
Unco said:
Did anyone think that Ed may be expected to form his own judgements?
Not from the form of the question or the tenor of the "don't forget" hint, no.

03jwood said:
Oh no, Eliz that's so depressing....
Tell me about it! I shed no tears when I left the education department.

Eliz.
 
Thanks a bundle....really.

Well, I agree that calculators should have full use wherever useable. However, due to the nature of this question and the sad fact that only two answers will be accepted...I have resorted to your such kind help. Thanks again. I'll be back. Ed.
 
03jwood
There are people out there, I am definitely one of them, who think that we should be using a computer algebra system- Maple, MathCad, MATHEMATICA- to teach mathematics. Laptop computers will be ubiquitous among students in five years if not already. The TI89 and TI92 have a CAS, DERIVE, on them. Mathematics teaching and testing are going to have to be completely changed. Below is an example of test question where technology will not help, but nonetheless it test very deep mathematical principles.
test9lt.gif
 
Nice example. But --

If the student has relied on calculators his whole life, so he has no "deep" familiarity with fractions (so it never occurs to him that 0.5<sup>2</sup> = 0.25, a smaller number, or that sqrt[0.5] = 0.707106..., a larger number), then how would he proceed? If he's never graphed by hand, will he understand what happens to a zero upon squaring or square-rooting, having never been that intimately involved in the process? And what if the integral involved negative portions of the x-axis? Or negative areas?

If you've ever dealt with a student who stares blankly at you when you explain the step-by-step process and concepts, and then asks, "Yeah, but what buttons do I push?", you'll have some inkling of the frustration that this "all calculators, no [basic] math" philosophy can induce.

True story: I was tutoring a high-school senior. In the course of working through some algebra exercise, I asked the boy to multiply four and one-fourth. He looked at me like I was nuts, and said, "I can't: this calculator doesn't have a fraction key!" He was in a "progressive" school using a "reform" curriculum, so he was no doubt "doing deep math" -- but I wouldn't ask him for change for a dollar, if I were you.

Eliz.
 
Top