Can anyone tell me whether further playing around with this one is going to yield a more simplified result? I'm at a bit of a dead end with it. See attached pic.
Ok, well first of all, here is the corrected version of the above simplification, with one additional step:
And here is my proof that the fourth line divided by the final line is equal to 1:
The problem with this method of double checking though, is that it involves doing the same operations as the original simplification, so it doesn't really constitute proof that those operations are legitimate.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.