Re: acceleration word problem?
No,no. You need contstant decelleration and you don't know what it is. You started off already knowing!
a(t) = x <== That's ft/sec^2
v(t) = x*t + v0 <== That's ft/sec
s(t) = ½x*t^2 + v0*t + h0 <== That's ft
Now, what do we know?
v0 = 44 ft/sec
h0 = 0 ft
s(t) = ½x*t^2 + 44*t
And there must be reasonable values for x and t0 such that s(t0) <= 45
This is where this problem get's a little tricky. We have to think about it a bit from here unless you ave left out some of the problem statement. Without a time period in which to stop, there could be a few problems.
1) Quite obviously, there are limitations on stopping. If you hit a brick wall, you would stop very quickly, and certainly within 45 feet. Normally, however, this is not considered a valid stopping method. So, infinite decelleration is out of the question.
2) Suppose we were riding straight up and we just let gravity do the decelleration? This makes x = -32 ft/sec^2 and produces a 45 ft stopping time of ... What? We never get to 45 ft!! Well, okay, 1 g might be too much stopping power.
3) In order to stop EXACTLY on 45 ft, one sets s(t0) = 45 ft and solves for t0. This gives a lovely quadrtic equation that is easily solves and contains the discriminant 1936+90x. Since this must be > 0, we see that x > -968/45 = -21.511 and leads to about 2.045 seconds.
4) Of course, anything greater than -21.511 will work, but, like I said in #1, some decellerations will throw you off the bike.